Three-Minute Judges

Tuesday's World Events   —   Posted on October 24, 2006

(by Priya Abraham, WorldMag.com) – As of Oct. 1 James Hall could officially mothball his CEO title. He headed a humanitarian group that has offered education and small business development in Uzbekistan for 15 years. But this summer the government shut down the Central Asian Free Exchange for operating said CAFE without a license to use the internet, teach, or print books even though the group had used the government’s own publishing house. When Hall offered his defense to a judges’ panel, the judges returned a guilty verdict after deliberating just 3 1/2 minutes. So Hall had to close his group’s 10 development centers, lay off 300 Uzbek workers and exit the country along with other foreign employees.

Hall’s storyline is similar to that of several nonprofits working in Uzbekistan. In the last year alone, hundreds of local and Western organizations have been forced to close.

Religious persecution has also intensified, with harsh restrictions on both Muslims and Christians. The deterioration prompted a U.S. scolding last month, when Ambassador-at-Large for Religious Freedom John Hanford said Uzbekistan “deserves to be singled out.”

Repressing believers could earn the Central Asian republic a spot on the State Department’s list of the world’s worst persecutors this fall, called “Countries of Particular Concern,” which can carry punitive actions, including sanctions.

While Hall had to fold his 15-year operation, President Islam Karimov is trying to extend his 15-year rule. Next year Uzbekistan will elect a president. Constitutionally Karimov cannot stand for reelection because a president may serve only two five-year terms. But already he has fudged the rules to take another five.

Warned by peaceful revolutions that swept Ukraine, Georgia, and neighboring Kyrgyzstan, Karimov also knows his people could topple him. So for three years he has clamped down harder on dissent and free expression – accusing foreign nonprofits of hidden agendas to incite uprisings. Authorities routinely arrest, detain, and torture Muslims, as well as Christians and human-rights defenders, who are often falsely labeled extremists.

And if Westerners feel the bite, life for ordinary Uzbeks is worse. “Within the last year and a half people have grown disillusioned and very unhappy, shamed by [Karimov’s] action,” said Hall. Many complain that times are tougher now than under the Russians 15 years ago. And high taxes make it hard to do business, all but crowding out hand-to-mouth petty trading at bazaars.

One former aid worker, who requested anonymity because he wishes to return to Uzbekistan and fears angering the government, said officials recently tried to shift to a totally cashless society. The effort failed, he said: “People are not going to have a point-of-sale computer at their onion stand.”

The Karimov crackdown also stems from an uprising in May 2005 when state forces in Andijon killed about 500 people demonstrating against the imprisonment of local businessmen (“Long, hot summer ahead,” June 4, 2005). The massacre prompted widespread condemnation from the West, and rocky relations between Uzbekistan and the United States.

When Washington criticized Karimov’s handling of Andijon, he quickly ordered the United States to leave its air base in Karshi-Khanabad, a key staging ground used for missions into Afghanistan. Since then, operations have shifted to farther-off and more expensive Manas Airport in Kyrgyzstan. With that in mind, some in the Bush administration are pushing to repair relations with Karimov.

In the meantime, Russia and China have moved in, building bigger business interests and military ties with Uzbekistan. With those two regional giants deepening their influence, “Central Asia is playing an important role in foreign policy calculations,” said Ariel Cohen, a Heritage Foundation analyst.

Last month, President Bush heartily welcomed to the White House Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev, an autocratic leader he has previously criticized. But Kazakhstan offers a rare commodity in rough times: support for the war on terror. In a region thick with dictators but high on value, how the Bush administration manages its relationship with Nazarbayev, Karimov, and others is a measure of whether democratization is a top priority now.

For the near future, Karimov appears to have free reign in turning off democracy-breeding outlets. Correspondents for Radio Free Liberty and the BBC are no longer allowed in the country, closing off two of the main independent news sources used by Uzbeks. The government has also booted out other big names, such as Freedom House and the Peace Corps.

Human Rights Watch has survived but is under audit. “It’s pure vengeance against the United States,” said Rachel Denber, deputy director of the group’s Europe and Central Asia Division. “More broadly, it’s an effort by the Uzbek government to shut down all institutions that promote civil society.” With observers gone, Karimov potentially has more opportunity to manipulate next year’s elections.

After Andijon hundreds of fearful Uzbeks fled the country as refugees, many across the border into Kyrgyzstan. Some have settled abroad, but the Kyrgyz government has also forced some to return. Among the groups closed was the United Nations High Commission for Refugees, which was resettling some 2,000 mostly Afghan refugees – but also Uzbeks from Andijon. A March missive from Uzbekistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said, “UNHCR has fully implemented its tasks and there are no evident reasons for its further presence in Uzbekistan . . . the ministry requests UNHCR to close its office in Tashkent within one month.” Very rarely do countries eject the refugee agency.

Religious freedom is also withering fast, according to the State Department’s 2006 report. In June, Karimov signed into law amendments that make it harder to publish and distribute religious literature. A violator could face fines of 50 to 100 times the $8-a-month minimum wage. The restrictions particularly target Muslims who spread publications to share their faith.

Uzbekistan does have a legitimate problem with Islamic extremism, largely with a group called Hizb-ut-Tahrir that advocates a worldwide caliphate. But Karimov exploits the problem as an excuse to target all observant Muslims, usually accusing them of “Wahhabism” after Saudi Arabia’s toxic brand of Islam. Only state-sanctioned mosques are legal.

“The whole population is being badly treated across the board,” Hall said. “The problem is extreme control. I think Islamic extremism would dry up if they let the economy loose. . . . Uzbeks are really being almost driven into Islamic extremism.”

Christians also have difficulties: Many congregations do not have enough members to register and worship legally. And raids against Protestant house churches are becoming more frequent. One of the latest came in August, when some 20 police and secret police officers raided a camp in the southern town of Termez. Wearing bullet-proof vests and toting automatic guns, according to the Forum 18 news service, the police arrested 20 worshippers and confiscated Bibles. The men arrested suffered systematic beatings, and authorities deported one Polish man.

Hall found Uzbek officials sometimes showed breaks in their tough line. During his organization’s trial, he had to defend his publication of a health manual, and he brought copies for the judges to scan. The judges liked them so much, they asked Hall if they could keep the books. Karimov’s orders may not always make sense, but for now, he reigns supreme.

Copyright ©2006 WORLD Magazine, October 14th, 2006 issue.  Reprinted here October 24th with permission from World Magazine. Visit the website at WorldMag.com.

Questions

1.  a) Name the capital of Uzbekistan. 
b) List the countries that border Uzbekistan.

2.  a) Who is James Hall? 
b) Why was he ordered to leave Uzbekistan? 
c) How many Uzbeks were affected by Mr. Hall’s departure?

3.  a) Who is John Hanford? 
b) What has Mr. Hanford said about Uzbekistan?

4.  a) What is a “Country of Particular Concern?” 
b) How does the U.S. treat a country that has been put on the CPC list?
(To read about contries designated as “Countries of Particular Concern,” go to USCIRF.gov [the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, established by the the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, a law passed by Congress to promote religious freedom as a U.S. foreign policy goal and to combat religious persecution in other countries.])

5.  a) What are the reasons for Uzbek President Karimov’s crackdown on dissent and free expression?
b) What specific groups are being targeted?

6.  a) What happened in Andijon, Uzbekistan in May 2005? 
b) How did President Karimov respond to the U.S.’s criticism of this incident? 
c) Why are some in the Bush administration pushing to repair relations with President Karimov?

7.  a) Name the media and humanitarian groups mentioned in this article that were ordered to leave Uzbekistan.
b) For what reason were these groups made to leave?

8.  Re-read paragraph 16-17.  For what two reasons do you think the new restrictions particularly target Muslims? 
(One reason can be found in the article.  For the other, go to the CIA World FactBook here and scroll down to “PEOPLE” and then read the statistic under “Religions.”)

9.  Mr. Hall asserts that “Uzbeks are being almost driven into Islamic extremism.”  Do you agree with his belief?  Explain your answer.


Free Answers — Sign-up here to receive a weekly email with answers.

Resources

For a map of Uzbekistan, go to worldatlas.com.

For a map and background of Uzbekistan, go to the CIA World FactBook here.