MEXICO – Government Gave Free TVs to Poor, but Defects Wasted Taxpayers’ Money
(by Juan Montes, The Wall Street Journal) MEXICO CITY—Mexico’s congressional audit office has ruled that a controversial government program to give away some 10 million flat-screen TV sets to the poor wasted an estimated $39 million of taxpayers’ money.
The audit found that some 339,000 of the televisions in President Enrique Peña Nieto’s nearly $1-billion program were defective. The subsidy program was aimed at helping the poor during the country’s 2015 switch from analog to digital signals for television.
Around 12,200 television sets are missing altogether, the audit office said as part of a recently released wide-ranging review of government spending in 2015. Together with the defective sets, the office computed the probable loss to Mexico’s coffers at $39 million.
The finding comes in the wake of broader concerns about the TV giveaway. In September, The Wall Street Journal published a story about the program that included allegations that a high-ranking Mexican official asked for kickbacks during the bidding process. At the time, senior government officials said the acquisition of TVs was transparent and legal.
“The irregularities found by the audit office showcase the problems of corruption that the program has had, and also the government’s lack of capacity to implement it correctly,” said Marco Fernández, a professor at the Tecnológico de Monterrey and researcher at think-tank México Evalúa.
In response to questions about the audit, Mexico’s Communications and Transport Ministry, which handled the program, said it was taking legal action to get restitution from the company that provided the defective television sets. It didn’t name the supplier.
Regarding the 12,000 missing televisions, the ministry said 8,000 were handed out after the audit office finished its report and that the rest were in the process of being delivered.
Contracts for almost two-thirds of the sets went to domestic electronics wholesaler Comercializadora Milenio SA, in partnership with its sister company, domestic television manufacturer Diamond Electronics SA. In one case Diamond was awarded a no-bid contract for 460,000 sets, government documents show. Both firms have denied any wrongdoing.
Although Mexico is the world’s largest exporter of flat-screen TVs, none of the leading television manufacturers with operations here played a prominent role in the giveaway initiative. Mexico’s largest producer, Samsung, was disqualified for technical reasons, according to government documents.
The program, launched in 2014 and 2015, was one of the largest targeted subsidy in Mexico’s recent history.
Critics said the program was politically motivated and sought to increase the popularity of Mr. Peña Nieto’s government. In most of the country, the TVs came stamped with the Peña Nieto administration’s motto, “Moving Mexico.” Others said the government shunned less-expensive alternatives, including the converter boxes used in most other countries.
In a separate report published in August by Mexico’s telecom regulator, a commissioner wrote that around half of the televisions were given away to people who already had digital TVs or converter boxes. The ministry said it had relied on a list of needy families provided by the Social Development Ministry in allocating the sets.
BAHRAIN – Government moves to ban opposition party and let army courts try civilians
(by Patrick Wintour, The UK Guardian) — Bahrain has taken steps to ban the main opposition party and transfer many civilian judicial cases to a military court, in what appears to be a new crackdown on dissent and human rights.
British Prime Minister Theresa May visited Bahrain only three months ago as part of a drive to deepen UK military and trading links. The UK has been funding efforts to set up a police ombudsman in Bahrain, but conceded in its 2016 annual human rights report that developments in the country were a cause for concern.
The Gulf state, led by King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa, has been repeatedly accused of curtailing freedoms of expression, association and assembly. Rights groups allege that torture and other abuses are common, especially in the country’s notorious prisons.
On Monday Bahrain’s justice ministry filed a lawsuit seeking to dissolve the main remaining opposition group on the grounds that it undermined security, the state-run Bahrain news agency reported.
The secular [non-religious] National Democratic Action Society, or Wa’ad, had perpetrated “serious violations targeting the principle of respecting the rule of law, supporting terrorism and sanctioning violence by glorifying people convicted for terrorism cases.” the ministry said.
Authorities last year dissolved the then largest opposition group al-Wefaq and revoked the citizenship of the country’s top Shia Muslim cleric.
On Sunday the upper house of parliament approved a constitutional amendment that critics say will allow authorities to run the country under an undeclared state of martial law. The change will allow civilians to be tried by military courts if the case involves the military.
Low-level and occasionally violent unrest has agitated the Gulf kingdom since its Shia Muslim majority led protests in 2011 that were violently suppressed by the Sunni Muslim-led government with help from its Gulf Arab neighbors.
The sixth anniversary of the uprising last month led to a spate of violence, and claims by the authorities that they had uncovered a terrorist cell more than 50 strong operating in multiple locations.
There were also street protests in January when three Shia Muslim men convicted of killing an Emirati police officer and two Bahraini police officers in a 2014 bomb attack were executed.
Bahrain accuses Shia Iran of inciting violence in the kingdom…
A motion to criticize Bahrain’s behavior tabled by Switzerland at the UN human rights council in Geneva on Monday was expected to be beaten back in part due to UK fears it was not balanced. …
THE NETHERLANDS – Geert Wilders, Dutch PM frontrunner says ‘Islam and freedom are not compatible’
(by Yasmeen Serhan, The Atlantic) – Dutch voters will kick off the first of several pivotal European elections when they hold their parliamentary elections on March 15. Most polls show Geert Wilders, the leader of the conservative Dutch Freedom Party (PVV), running neck-and-neck with the ruling liberal People’s Party (VVD) for Freedom and Democracy, led by Prime Minister Mark Rutte. The remaining 12 parties, which include mostly center and left-wing groups, are projected to each take anywhere between zero to 18 seats.
The results of the election could have an impact far beyond the Netherlands. Like the upcoming French and German elections, the Dutch vote is seen by some as a litmus test for establishment candidates facing Wilders, whose populist messaging has been compared to France’s Marine Le Pen.
Opinion polls project Wilders’ PVV getting anywhere between 22 and 28 seats in the 150-seat lower house of Dutch parliament—far below the 76 needed to form a government. This is due, in part, to the Netherlands’ multi-party system, which makes coalition governments almost inevitable, Dr. Andrej Zaslove, an assistant professor of political science at the Radboud University Nijmegen, told me.
“Dutch politics is about coalition forming, and traditionally the largest party is given the chance to go and have talks with other political parties and form a government,” Zaslove said, adding: “Even if he [Wilders] was in power, he’s not going to be Donald Trump where he can pass executive laws willy nilly. It’s about dealmaking.”
It’s possible that Wilders’ PVV could win the majority of parliamentary seats and still be excluded from entering the government coalition. In fact, it’s likely. Current Prime Minister Rutte’s VVD and all the parties to the left of it have already ruled out forming a government with Wilders.
“Zero percent Geert, ZERO percent. It. Is. Not. Going. To. Happen,” Rutte tweeted last month.
Wilders responded in kind, tweeting: “It’s the voters who are in charge of this country Mark, for a HUNDRED percent. And. Nobody. In. The. Netherlands. Still. Believes. You.”
Wilders would have a hard time achieving many of his campaign promises without a coalition, which, if current polling holds, could include as many as five different parties—the most in a coalition in more than four decades. Wilders’ platform is typical of conservative populist parties: He wants a Netherlands that closes its borders to immigrants and asylum-seekers, seeks a Brexit-style referendum to leave the European Union, and spends more on defense and security. He pledges to put the Netherlands first. …
…Wilders has been under round-the-clock police surveillance since 2004 due to multiple threats on his life—a decision that was made following the assassination of gay conservative Dutch politician Pim Fortuyn in 2002 [by a Dutchman who said he wanted to prevent the “scapegoating” of Muslims], just days ahead of the country’s general election, and the horrific murder two years later of filmmaker Theo van Gogh by a Dutch Moroccan Muslim over Van Gogh’s film Submission, which is critical of Islam’s terrible treatment of women. …
(The news briefs above are from wire reports and staff reports posted at The Wall Street Journal on March 3 [Mexico], The UK Guardian on March 6 [Bahrain] and The Atlantic on March 3 [Netherlands].)
1. For each of the 3 countries, give the following information:
Find the answers at the CIA World FactBook website. For each country, answers can be found under the “Geography” “People” and “Government” headings.
NOTE: Before answering the questions below, read the info under “Background” and watch the video under “Resources.”
2. For MEXICO:
a) list the who, what, where and when of the news item
b) How many TVs in total did the Mexican government give away?
c) What was the total cost of this government give-away?
d) How many of the TVs given away were defective? – How much did this amount to?
e) What was the purpose of the TV give-away?
f) List 4-5 facts that illustrate the corruption and/or ineffectiveness of this program.
3. For BAHRAIN:
a) list the who, what, where and when of the news item
b) On what grounds did Bahrain’s justice ministry seek to ban the main opposition party?
c) What effect will this have?
4. For NETHERLANDS:
a) list the who, what, where and when of the news item
b) Read the “Background” and watch the video under “Resources.” Wilders is labeled “far-right extremist” etc. What do you think? Are his assertions reasonable or unreasonable?
CHALLENGE QUESTION: Research the Netherlands’ form of government. Explain the parliamentary system. Explain what it means to “form a government” after elections. What is a coalition government? What is the multi-party system?
Conservative populist politician Geert Wilders has said Islam is a threat to European values and is incompatible with freedom.
“Dutch values are based on Christianity, on Judaism, on humanism. Islam and freedom are not compatible,” Mr. Wilders, 53, told USA Today in February.
“You see it in almost every country where it dominates. There is a total lack of freedom, civil society, rule of law, middle class; journalists, gays, apostates — they are all in trouble in those places. And we import it.”
Mr. Wilders told USA Today:
“Even if I lose this election, the genie will not go back in the bottle again.
“People are fed up with the combination of mass immigration, Islamization and austerity measures that require us to cut pensions and support for health care and the elderly while giving [bailout] money to Greece and the eurozone.”
He added: “On Islam, it is true that I am tough. Perhaps tougher than I should be if my only aim was to get votes. But I really believe in what I say, that the Islamic ideology is this huge threat.”
“For a long time, our society has been afraid to say, ‘No, this is our Dutch culture, we don’t treat women like that,’ and anyone who did was labelled a racist or bigot or hate-monger, and they are not,” Wilders said. They just believe we should be more proud of who we are.”
Wilders’ opposition to Islamist ideology has placed him on al-Qaeda, Taliban and Islamic State assassination lists for more than a decade. He wears a bulletproof vest in public, has an elaborate security detail and moves with his wife between safe houses.
In 2002, Dutch gay politician Pim Fortuyn was murdered for his outspoken views on Islamic ideology. Two years later, Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh was killed by a Dutch-Moroccan Muslim for a short film he made that was critical of Islam’s treatment of women.
“I wouldn’t wish it on my worst enemy. I can’t even go on a spontaneous walk or to a restaurant without armored cars and police, but there is no alternative,” Wilders said. “If I stop or moderate my voice, people who use or threaten violence against democracies would win. I will never let them win.”
(from articles on Wilders at the UK Independent and USA Today)