(by Priya Abraham, WorldMag.com) – Uzbek government forces may have stopped gunning down protesters within one day, but residents of Andijan city have found that the crackdown against them is only beginning. With scattered gunfire at night, security checkpoints, and an unofficial curfew, fear and resentment of the country’s regime are rising among local residents and nationwide.
More than a week after forces killed 700-1,000 demonstrators on May 13, those wounded in the attack are still too afraid to seek help at local hospitals. They worry that the authorities will identify them as dissidents. But this latest brutality from 15-year President Islam Karimov is already being described as Uzbekistan’s Tiananmen Square–and ironically, could be the genesis of his downfall.
For days protesters congregated in Andijan, a city located in the populous Fergana Valley in eastern Uzbekistan. Locals were angry over the year-long imprisonment of 23 businessmen dubiously accused of being Islamic radicals. On May 12, armed men–according to some reports, relatives and employees of the businessmen–stormed the prison and released hundreds of inmates. They soon occupied an administrative building close by and took hostages. As word spread of the armed bid, locals congregated outside by the thousands and continued protesting.
To the crowd’s shock, when security forces appeared, they began firing on the unarmed protesters, even as some raised their hands shouting, “Don’t shoot!” Officially, the government reported 169 died, largely among security forces and attackers, who were accused of being terrorists with a banned Islamic group. The government has issued no statements of how the other protesters were slain.
“I think people are being pushed to the breaking point, especially outside of Tashkent,” explained a Western development worker who has lived in the capital, Tashkent, four years. He spoke to WORLD from Uzbekistan by satellite phone and asked that his name not be used due to the security situation. “In spite of the willingness to use deadly force by the government, most people expect this uprising to continue, possibly all the way to Tashkent,” he said.
Mr. Karimov, the country’s former Communist Party leader in its days as a Soviet republic, does have to contend with Muslim radicals within his borders. One group, Hizb ut-Tahrir, would like to do away with Muslim nation states and rebuild a single ancient caliphate.
Another, the Islamic Movement of Turkestan, is active throughout Central Asia and took responsibility for bombings in Tashkent last year. U.S. forces reportedly killed its leader in Afghanistan in 2001, where the group found sanctuary under the Taliban–a deed for which Mr. Karimov thanked Washington.
But the specter of an Islamic radical takeover has long been a convenient excuse to crush all dissent within Muslim Uzbekistan and smother religious practice. Muslim men devout enough to wear beards or women donning headscarves immediately fall under suspicion. Thousands have been imprisoned on tenuous charges, many tortured, and some prisoners–according to a former British ambassador–have been boiled to death. Christians and other minority faiths also suffer raids and harassment from officials.
But the latest protests show that any patience with Mr. Karimov is evaporating. As he tries harder to throttle vocal discontent, national frustration could feed Muslim extremism. “The more brutal Karimov is in his oppression of all dissidents, the more he calls into being the Frankenstein he claims to be fighting,” said Larry Uzzell, an expert on Russia and the former Soviet Union with International Religious Freedom Watch.
Nonetheless, most grievances stem from the grinding poverty Uzbeks endure, particularly in the cotton-growing Fergana Valley. Planeloads of Uzbeks fly to Russia as migrant workers. Andijan protesters appealed to President Vladimir Putin to intervene on their behalf, viewing Russia as a more legitimate and prosperous guardian. The Tashkent worker described Uzbekistan’s own government as a “highly developed mafia.”
“People here have put up so long with this government, which so tightly controls information and especially the economy,” he told WORLD. “Especially in the valley, conditions are so desperate that people are willing to die rather than ‘live like dirt’ as one local was quoted in the underground media here. It is almost impossible to start a business and make a living with such a tightly controlled economy, corruption and bribes at every level.”
Uzbekistan’s latest tyranny has backed the United States into a diplomatic corner. Mr. Karimov has been a valuable ally in the war on terror, allowing a U.S. air base on his soil for use in the Afghanistan war, which has scaled back operations since the crackdown. While the West quickly condemned the May 13 slaughter, Washington hesitated for days to join in protest. State Department and other federal bodies have long criticized Uzbekistan’s human-rights abuses, but the United States has so far declined to act tough.
Meanwhile, any revolution in Uzbekistan will likely be violent, unlike the heartwarming and bloodless turnovers in Georgia and Ukraine. Who would replace Mr. Karimov is an unanswered question; the democratic opposition is splintered and exiled, with no one charismatic chief to lead the charge. “There’s a strong struggle between the minister of the interior and the minister of the security services,” said Adolat Najimova, director of Radio Free Europe’s Uzbek service. “If one of them comes to power it will basically remain the same. The only hope is that democratic forces will unite.”
The Andijan uprising sparked riots in another Fergana Valley town, Korasuv, which briefly caused government forces to flee. Residents re-opened a bridge closed two years ago leading across the border to a Kyrgyzstan bazaar. By May 19, however, Uzbek forces had regained control and arrested local rebel leader Bakhtiyor Rakhimov. But hundreds of refugees have been fleeing through border towns into Kyrgyzstan pleading for asylum.
For now Mr. Karimov is resisting international calls for an independent investigation, largely barring diplomats, journalists, and human-rights researchers from the restive cities. Nonetheless, the development worker in Tashkent believes that Uzbekistan has reached a turning point. “I think this changes everything,” he said. “If the government doesn’t change its tactics–and I don’t have any indication that they will–we are in for one hell of a struggle. It is a watershed moment most definitely. The long hot summer ahead will be most interesting.”
Reprinted here with permission from World Magazine. Visit the website at www.worldmag.com.
1. How many demonstrators were killed by government forces in Uzbekistan on May 13? Describe the events that led up to the shootings. How does the official website of Uzbekistan’s Embassy in the U.S. contradict the report of this article and other news reports? (For website, Click here.)
2. Who is the President of Uzbekistan? What legitimate problem does he face in Uzbekistan? How has he used that problem to suppress all dissent within the country? What might be an unintended consequence of his brutal oppression?
3. List the countries that border Uzbekistan. When did Uzbekistan gain its independence from Russia? What is unusual about the airports in Uzbekistan? What do you notice about telephone use in Uzbekistan? Approximately what percent of the Uzbek population lives below the poverty line? (What percent of the U.S. population lives below the poverty line? Where did you find the answer?)
4. What is the root of the Uzbek people’s willingness to protest the government at the risk of imprisonment or death? What actions in the government prevent this issue from being solved? What problem does Uzbekistan face if they are successful in getting rid of President Karimov? How could this problem be solved?
5. Why hasn’t the U.S. government been vocal in denouncing such blatant human rights abuses? Is the U.S. government doing the right thing? Explain your answer.