USA Today: Motorists Aren’t Paying Enough for Roads

Wednesday's Example of Media Bias   —   Posted on November 29, 2006

Jump to...

Print

Directions

-Read the excerpt below from Ken Shepherd's Nov. 20th BusinessandMedia.org post.
-Read "Types of Media Bias" in the right column. Then answer the questions.

…you’re not paying enough in taxes for those roads you’re driving on, [is] the viewpoint Larry Copeland of USA Today advanced on the front page of the paper’s November 20 edition in his article, “Motorists face new costs for highways: States, cities finding gas tax inadequate.”

Yet while Copeland…relay[ed] the…pleas of politicians [for increased funding], he left out conservative critics who argue states and the federal government already bring in plenty of tax money for maintaining roads and building bridges.

…Dr. Ronald Utt of the conservative Heritage Foundation told the Business & Media Institute…that “only about 60 percent of the federal fuel tax” goes to road projects that benefit motorists. “The rest leaks off into diversions and frivolities,” Utt added.

Among those “diversions and frivolities” are numerous “earmarked” expenditures, known commonly as pork-barrel projects, which have little to do with paving roads or building bridges.

Nowhere in his story did Copeland hint that reckless spending has a role in transportation funding inadequacies.

….Copeland went on to suggest new taxes states could levy on motorists, such as a “pay by the mile” program being tested in Oregon or “congestion pricing” for toll road use at rush hours. 

For the complete report, go to BusinessAndMedia.org.

Questions

What 2 types of bias is this excerpt an example of?


Scroll down to the bottom of the page for the answers.
























Answer(s)

The excerpt is an example of bias by omission and selection of sources.