(by Thomas Sowell, Townhall.com) – What is most like Alice in Wonderland is discussing medical care reform in the abstract, as if there are not already government-run medical care systems in this country and elsewhere.

Yet there seems to be remarkably little interest in examining how government-run medical care actually turns out– medically and financially– whether in Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Administration hospitals in this country, or in government-run medical systems in other countries.

We are repeatedly being told that we need to have a government-controlled medical care system, because other countries have it– as if our policies on something as serious as medical care should be based on the principle of monkey see, monkey do.

By all means look at other countries, but not just to see what to imitate. See how it actually turns out. Yet there seems to be an amazing lack of interest in examining what government-controlled medical care produces.

While our so-called health care “summit” last week was going on, British newspapers were carrying exposes of terrible, and often deadly, conditions in British hospitals under that country’s National Health Service. But this has not become part of our debate on what to expect from government-controlled medical care.

Such scandals are an old story under the National Health Service in Britain, one repeatedly producing fresh scandals that their newspapers carry, but ours ignore.

In addition to a whole series of National Health Service scandals in Britain over the years, the government-run medical system in Britain has far less high-tech medical equipment than there is in the United States. Neither in Britain, Canada, nor in other countries with government-run medical care systems can people get to see doctors, especially surgeons, in as short a time as in the United States.

It is not uncommon for patients in those countries to have to wait for months before getting operations that Americans get within weeks, or even days, after being diagnosed with a condition that requires surgery. You can always “bring down the cost of medical care” by having a lower level of quality or availability.

But, again, you may never learn any of this by following most of the American mainstream media. It is not that they don’t make comparisons between medical care in different countries. But they tend to feature news that will promote government-controlled care.

One of the statistics they spin endlessly is that life expectancy in some countries with government-controlled medical care is higher than in the United States. What they don’t tell you is that, in some of these countries, all the infants that die are not included in infant mortality statistics, as they are in the United States.

More important, both political and media supporters of government-controlled medical care consistently confuse medical care with health care.

Much, if not most, of health care depends on what individuals do in the way they live their own lives– including eating habits, alcohol intake, exercise, narcotics and homicide. A study some years ago found that Mormons live a decade longer than other Americans. But nobody believes that Mormons’ doctors are that much better than other doctors. When you don’t do a lot of things that shorten your life, you live longer. That is not rocket science.

Americans tend to have higher rates of obesity, narcotics use and homicide than people in some other countries. And there is not much that doctors can do about that.

If those who make international comparisons were serious, instead of clever, they would compare the things that medical science can have a great effect on– cancer survival rates, for example. Americans have some of the highest cancer survival rates in the world, and for some particular cancers, the highest.

When you can get to see a doctor faster, and get treatments underway without waiting for months, while the cancer grows and spreads, you have a better chance of surviving. That, too, is not rocket science. But it is also something that you are not likely to see featured in most of the media, where people are promoting their own pet notions and agendas, instead of giving you the facts on which you can make up your own mind.

Dr. Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and the author of “Applied Economics” and “Black Rednecks and White Liberals.” 

Copyright ©2010 Salem Web Network. All Rights Reserved.  This article was first posted at Townhall.com on March 3, 2010.  Reprinted here March 4, 2010 for educational purposes only.  May not be reproduced on other websites without permission from Salem Web Network.

Questions

1. Read the following assertions made by Mr. Sowell. For each, state whether you agree or disagree and explain your answers.

  • We are repeatedly being told that we need to have a government-controlled medical care system, because other countries have it– as if our policies on something as serious as medical care should be based on the principle of monkey see, monkey do. By all means look at other countries, but not just to see what to imitate. See how it actually turns out. (para. 3-4)
  • Neither in Britain, Canada, nor in other countries with government-run medical care systems can people get to see doctors, especially surgeons, in as short a time as in the United States. It is not uncommon for patients in those countries to have to wait for months before getting operations that Americans get within weeks, or even days, after being diagnosed with a condition that requires surgery.
  • You can always “bring down the cost of medical care” by having a lower level of quality or availability. (para. 7-8)
  • you may never learn [about problems with government run health care in other countries] by following most of the American mainstream media. It is not that they don’t make comparisons between medical care in different countries. But they tend to feature news that will promote government-controlled care. (para. 9)
  • One of the statistics [the media] spin endlessly is that life expectancy in some countries with government-controlled medical care is higher than in the United States. What they don’t tell you is that, in some of these countries, all the infants that die are not included in infant mortality statistics, as they are in the United States. (para. 10)
  • If those who make international comparisons were serious … they would compare the things that medical science can have a great effect on– cancer survival rates, for example. Americans have some of the highest cancer survival rates in the world, and for some particular cancers, the highest. (para. 14)
  • When you can get to see a doctor faster, and get treatments underway without waiting for months, while the cancer grows and spreads, you have a better chance of surviving. That, too, is not rocket science. But it is also something that you are not likely to see featured in most of the media, where people are promoting their own pet notions and agendas, instead of giving you the facts on which you can make up your own mind. (para. 15)

2. What is the main point of Mr. Sowell’s commentary?
b) Do you agree or disagree? Explain your answer.