(by Michelle Malkin, HumanEvents.com) – However you feel about the Terri Schiavo case, one fact is indisputable: The mainstream media (MSM) coverage of the matter has been abysmal.
On a fundamental matter of life and death, the MSM heavyweights have proven themselves utterly incapable of reporting fairly. Take a widely publicized ABC News poll released on Monday that supposedly showed strong public opposition to any Washington intervention in Terri’s case. Here is how the spinmasters framed the main poll question:
“As you may know, a woman in Florida named Terri Schiavo suffered brain damage and has been on life support for 15 years. Doctors say she has no consciousness and her condition is irreversible. Her parents and her husband disagree on whether or not she should be kept on life support. In cases like this who do you think should have final say, (the parents) or (the spouse)?”
A follow-up question asked:
“If you were in this condition, would you want to be kept alive, or not?”
The problem is that, contrary to what ABC News told those polled, Terri Schiavo is not on “life support” and has never been on “life support.” The loaded phrase evokes images of a comatose patient being artificially sustained by myriad machines and pumps and wires. Terri was on a feeding tube. A feeding tube is not a ventilator. Terri can breathe just fine on her own.
And as many of her medical caretakers and parents have argued, if given proper rehabilitation, Terri could learn to chew and swallow on her own as well. She is disabled, not dead.
But ABC News did not see fit to inform either the poll takers or its viewers of the truth. Instead, it misled them — and the result was a poll response that produced — voila! — “broad public disapproval” for any government intervention to spare Terri from slowly starving to death. Blogger Ed Morrissey of Captain’s Quarters noted: “Either ABC is completely incompetent in conducting research, or they have attempted to fool their viewers and readership with false polling that essentially lies about the case in question. Since when does ABC conduct push polling for euthanasia?”
Imagine how the poll results might have turned out if ABC News had made clear to participants that Terri is not terminally ill. Not in excruciating pain. Capable of saying “Mommy” and “Help me.” And of “getting the feeling she’s falling” or getting “excited,” in her husband’s own testimony, when her head is not held properly.
Imagine how the poll results might have turned out if ABC News had informed participants that in a sworn affidavit, registered nurse Carla Sauer Iyer, who worked at the Palm Garden of Largo Convalescent Center in Largo, Fla., while Terri Schiavo was a patient there, testified: “Throughout my time at Palm Gardens, Michael Schiavo was focused on Terri’s death. Michael would say ‘When is she going to die?’ ‘Has she died yet?’ and ‘When is that b—h gonna die?'”
Now, if you were in this situation, would you want to be kept alive, or not?
Not to pick on ABC News, but, well, let’s. In an attempt to embarrass Rep. Dave Weldon (R.-Fla.) who noted that withdrawing food and water from someone like Schiavo was extremely rare, ABC’s Jake Tapper last week featured this counter-quote from Prof. Bill Allen, of the University of Florida College of Medicine:
“Feeding tubes have been removed in the United States for many years, and it’s been a common practice. This has happened in many cases, probably a hundred thousand times in this country.”
“A hundred thousand times”? There have been a hundred thousand cases of non-terminally ill, non-brain dead individuals slowly starved and forced to die in this country? Tapper demanded no proof from his professor. Instead, he dismissed lawmakers as ignoramuses contradicted by “experts,” cited the biased ABC News poll cited above, and tossed it back to Jennings with this slam: “Terri Schiavo and her family deserved better than the way Congress worked this week.”
Meanwhile, contradicting the experience of every starved child in Africa and abandoned street animal at your SPCA shelter, the New York Times informs us: “Experts Say Ending Feeding Can Lead to a Gentle Death.”
Is it any wonder the credibility of the MSM is withering on the vine?
Mrs. Malkin is author of Invasion: How America Still Welcomes Terrorists, Criminals, and Other Foreign Menaces to Our Shores (Regnery).
Reprinted here with permission from Human Events. Visit the website at HumanEvents.com.
1. What is the main idea of Michelle Malkin’s commentary?
2. What “fact” in the ABC poll question is FALSE? How does Terri breathe?
3. Is ABC completely incompetent in conducting research, or did they deliberately lie about the case in question? Explain your answer.
4. List some of the things registered nurse Carla Iyer testified that Michael Schiavo said about Terri. Have you read or heard about any of this testimony in the mainstream media? Does Carla’s testimony change your viewpoint? Explain your answer.
5. What should a newsman always do that ABC’s Jake Tapper did not do when hearing from Professor Bill Allen?
6. Whose experience does the New York Times contradict when they report “Experts Say Ending Feeding Can Lead to a Gentle Death”? Regardless of how you feel about the Terri Schiavo case, do you believe the media is biased in their reporting on this issue? Explain your answer.