US Raises Stakes on Iran by Sending in Ships and Missiles

Daily News Article   —   Posted on February 1, 2010

NOTE: This article is from the British newspaper The Guardian.

(by Chris McGreal, Guardian.co.uk) WASHINGTON, D.C. — Tension between the US and Iran heightened dramatically today with the disclosure that Barack Obama is deploying a missile shield to protect American allies in the Gulf from attack by Tehran.

Persian GulfThe US is dispatching Patriot defensive missiles to four countries – Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Kuwait – and keeping two ships in the Gulf capable of shooting down Iranian missiles. Washington is also helping Saudi Arabia develop a force to protect its oil installations.

American officials said the move is aimed at deterring an attack by Iran and reassuring Gulf states fearful that Tehran might react to sanctions by striking at US allies in the region. Washington is also seeking to discourage Israel from a strike against Iran by demonstrating that the US is prepared to contain any threat.

The deployment comes after Obama’s attempts to emphasise diplomacy over confrontation in dealing with Iran – a contrast to the Bush administration’s approach – have failed to persuade Tehran to open its nuclear installations to international controls. The White House is now trying to engineer agreement for sanctions focused on Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, believed to be in charge of the atomic program.

Washington has not formally announced the deployment of the Patriots and other anti-missile systems, but by leaking it to American newspapers the administration is evidently seeking to alert Tehran to a hardening of its position.

The administration is deploying two Patriot batteries, capable of shooting down incoming missiles, in each of the four Gulf countries. Kuwait already has an older version of the missile, deployed after Iraq’s invasion. Saudi Arabia has long had the missiles, as has Israel.

An unnamed senior administration official told the New York Times: “Our first goal is to deter the Iranians. A second is to reassure the Arab states, so they don’t feel they have to go nuclear themselves. But there is certainly an element of calming the Israelis as well.”

The chief of the US central command, General David Petraeus, said in a speech 10 days ago that countries in the region are concerned about Tehran’s military ambitions and the prospect of it becoming a dominant power in the Gulf: “Iran is clearly seen as a very serious threat by those on the other side of the Gulf front.”

Petraeus said the US is keeping cruisers equipped with advanced anti-missile systems in the Gulf at all times to act as a buffer between Iran and the Gulf states.

Washington is also concerned at the threat of action by Israel, which is predicting that Iran will be able to build a nuclear missile within a year, a much faster timetable than assessed by the US, and is warning that it will not let Tehran come close to completion if diplomacy fails.

The director of the CIA, Leon Panetta, met the Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, and other senior officials in Jerusalem last week to discuss Iran.

Pro-Israel lobby groups in the U.S. have joined Republican party leaders in trying to build public pressure on the administration to take a tougher line with Iran. One group, the Israel Project, has been running a TV campaign warning that Iran might supply nuclear weapons to terrorists.

“Imagine Washington DC under missile attack from nearby Baltimore,” it says. “A nuclear Iran is a threat to peace, emboldens extremists, and could give nuclear materials to terrorists with the ability to strike anywhere.”

Washington is also concerned that if Iran is able to build nuclear weapons, other states in the region will feel the need to follow. Israel is the only country in the Middle East to already have atomic bombs, although it does not officially acknowledge it.

The U.S. secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, said in London last week that the US will press for additional sanctions against Iran if it fails to curb its nuclear program.

Europe’s foreign affairs minister, Catherine Ashton, today said the UN security council should now take up the issue. “We are worried about what’s happening in Iran. I’m disappointed at the failure of Iran to accept the dialogue and we now need to look again at what needs to happen there,” she told Sky News.

“The next step for us is to take our discussions into the security council. When I was meeting with Hillary Clinton last week we talked about Iran and we were very clear this is a problem we will have to deal with.”

However, China and Russia are still pressing for a diplomatic solution.

Tony Blair, Middle East envoy on behalf of the US, Russia, the UN and the EU, continually referred to what he described as the Iranian threat during his [testimony] at the Chilcot inquiry last Friday. Textual analysis now shows that he mentioned Iran 58 times.

Besides the new missile deployment, Washington is also helping Saudi Arabia to create a 30,000-strong force to protect oil installations and other infrastructure, as well as expanded joint exercises between the US and military forces in the region.

The move is a continuation of the military build-up begun under former president George W Bush. In the past two years, Abu Dhabi has bought $17billion worth of weapons from the U.S., including the Patriot anti-missile batteries and an advanced anti-missile system. UAE recently bought 80 US-made fighter jets. It is also buying fighters from France.

Petraeus said in a speech in Bahrain last year the UAE air force “could take out the entire Iranian air force, I believe”.

First published at the Guardian on Jan. 31, 2010.  Reprinted here for educational purposes only. May not be reproduced on other websites without permission from The Guardian. Visit the website at Guardian.co.uk. 

Questions

1. What does the Patriot missile do? (see “Background” below)

2. a) In what four countries will the U.S. place Patriot missiles?
b) What additional steps is the U.S. taking to protect Arab states from Iranian missiles?

3. For what three reasons is the U.S. positioning Patriot missiles in four Gulf states?

4. What efforts with Iran did the Obama administration make prior to backing the placement of Patriot missiles in these Gulf countries?

5. a) Who is David Petraeus?
b) What concern did Gen. Petraeus recently say countries in the Gulf region have about Iran?

6. Why is it thought that Israel might take military action against Iran in the coming year?

7. a) What defense assistance is the U.S. giving to Saudi Arabia?
b) Do you think the media would take a different view on this assistance if done under the Bush administration instead of the Obama administration?

8. a) Do you support the plan for installing Patriot missiles in Gulf states?  Explain your answer.

CHALLENGE QUESTION:  In September, the Obama administration canceled a plan for installing missile shields in eastern Europe that would have protected our allies in that region from Iranian nukes. (Read the article at studentnewsdaily.com/daily-news-article/u.s.-shelves-nuclear-missile-shield.)
Do you support the cancellation of the Eastern European missile defense system?  Explain your answer.


Free Answers — Sign-up here to receive a daily email with answers.

Background

PATRIOT MISSILES:

The Patriot missile system … is designed to detect, target and then hit an incoming missile that may be no more than 10 to 20 feet long and is typically flying at three to five times the speed of sound.  The upgraded Patriot system can also destroy incoming aircraft and cruise missiles.  The Patriot missile system has been deployed in many situations because it is able to shoot down enemy missiles (e.g. Scud missiles) and protect soldiers and civilians from a missile attack.  Patriot missile batteries were activated several times in the Iraqi war and were used extensively in the 1991 Gulf war. (from howstuffworks.com)

Patriot missiles are designed to intercept enemy missiles before they reach their target. Since production began in 1980, 9,000 missiles have been delivered to countries including Germany, Greece, Taiwan and Japan.  …Since the Gulf War, the U.S. has spent more than $10 billion improving, among other aspects, the system’s radar and computer compatibility for joint forces action. Once in position, the system requires a crew of only three people to operate. Each missile … has a range of about 100 miles.  The U.S. navy is in the process of upgrading all its Ticonderoga class cruisers and a number of destroyers to carry the Aegis ballistic missile defence system. It uses a surface-to-air missile that is capable of intercepting ballistic missiles above the atmosphere. It has also been tested on failing satellites as they fall to earth. Each missile is over 6m long and costs more than $9m. (by James Sturcke, Guardian.co.uk)