1.  Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia. Anyone can submit information on any topic. Some of the material on Wikipedia has been known to be inaccurate or biased.  
How might William M. Connolley's control over and manipulation of Global Warming entries posted at wikipedia affect a student's viewpoint of this theory?

2.  The blurbs below are reader responses to the Financial Post article about Mr. Connolley's deceptive manipulation of global warming entries at wikipedia.  What do you think of these responses?

• Wikipedia has done a great disservice in not policing its own "editors". With Wikipedia it appears it's impossible to predict the past!
• It's a real eye-opener to see how one single propagandist/activist has been allowed to act as a commissar of truth on such a massive - and putatively neutral - public information resource.
• Wikipedia can be used as a tool of misinformation
• [this was a] manipulation of information