Legalizing marijuana has negative effects?

Wednesday's Example of Media Bias   —   Posted on January 22, 2014

From a post by Kevin Sabet at The Washington Times (original post date 1/17/14):
On Jan. 1, Colorado made history as the first state to license the retail sales of marijuana.

To be sure, there were no bloody fistfights among people waiting in line and, as far as we know, no burglaries or robberies. Legalization advocates cheered. …

What didn’t make the news were some troubling developments:

  • Multimillion-dollar private investing groups have emerged and are poised to become, in their words, “Big Marijuana”
  • Added to a list of dozens of other children, a 2-year-old girl ingested a marijuana cookie and had to receive immediate medical attention
  • A popular website boldly discussed safe routes for smugglers to bring marijuana into neighboring states
  • A marijuana-store owner proudly proclaimed that Colorado would soon be the destination of choice for 18- to 21-year-olds, even though for them marijuana is still supposed to be illegal
[Other news you may not have seen:]
  • …The American Medical Association (AMA) has come out strongly against the legal sales of marijuana, citing public health concerns. In fact, the AMA’s opinion is consistent with most major medical associations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics and American Society of Addiction Medicine.
  • Because today’s marijuana is at least five to six times stronger than [it was in the past] – according to the National Institutes of Health, one in six 16-year-olds who try marijuana will become addicted to it
  • marijuana intoxication doubles the risk of a car crash
  • heavy marijuana use has been significantly linked to an 8-point reduction in IQ
  • marijuana use is…connected to mental illness [in teens]

Constantly downplaying the risks of marijuana, its advocates have promised reductions in crime, flowing tax revenue and little in the way of negative effects on youth. We shouldn’t hold our breath, though.

We can expect criminal organizations to adapt to legal prices, sell to people outside the legal market (e.g., kids) and continue to profit from other, much larger revenue sources, such as human trafficking and other drugs.

We can expect the social costs ensuing from increased marijuana use to greatly outweigh any tax revenue – witness the fact that tobacco and alcohol cost society $10 for every $1 gained in taxes.

Probably worst of all, we can expect our teens to be bombarded with promotional messages from a new marijuana industry seeking lifelong customers. …