1.  What is the main idea of this editorial?

2.  What facts do the editors use to support their assertion?

3.  Do you agree or disagree with the editors' conclusion: "Liberals used to understand that RFRA, with its balancing test, was a good-faith effort to help society compromise on contentious moral disputes. That liberals are renouncing it 20 years after celebrating it says more about their new intolerance than about anyone in Indiana"?  Explain your answer.