1. Status-of-forces agreements define the legal status of U.S. personnel and property in the territory of another nation. The purpose of such an agreement is to set forth rights and responsibilities between the United States and the host government on such matters as criminal and civil jurisdiction, the wearing of the uniform, the carrying of arms, tax and customs relief, entry and exit of personnel and property, and resolving damage claims.
What will U.S. troops in Iraq need search warrants for, after a new status-of-forces agreement is signed?

2. If ratified by the Iraqi parliament for January 1st, for how long will the status-of-forces agreement be in effect?

3. Under the status-of-forces agreement, under what circumstances would U.S. troops not be required to obtain warrants?

4. List the other main provisions of the status-of-forces agreement described in the article.

5. Why have U.S. officers expressed concern over a warrant requirement?

6. a) When was the first time U.S. troops used warrants in Iraq?
b) What danger do warrants pose for Iraqi complainants and witnesses?

7. Re-read para. 17-18. What do you think of Maj. McMillan's attitude toward the required use of warrants?