End of an Era in Australia

Daily News Article   —   Posted on November 26, 2007

(by Patrick Goodenough, CNSNews.com) – In an outcome that deprives President Bush of a close ally and friend on the world stage, weekend elections in Australia brought the John Howard era to an end, making way for a center-left government eager to support the Kyoto Protocol and pull troops from Iraq.

Prime Minister-elect Kevin Rudd’s Labor Party, in a landslide, ended the premiership of the second-longest serving leader in Australia’s history.

The Australian Election Commission reported Monday that with almost 79 percent of votes counted, Labor had picked up 23 seats to win 83 seats in the 150-member House of Representatives. Howard’s conservative Liberal-National coalition stood at 58 seats.

Howard suffered the additional ignominy of losing his own constituency seat to a Labor newcomer and former broadcast journalist.

Rudd, a 50-year-old former diplomat, this week will pick his cabinet, and he says ratifying the Kyoto Protocol is one of two top priorities for the incoming government.

The withdrawal from Iraq is expected to come later: The Labor Party campaigned on a pledge to begin the process in mid-2008.

Bush was among the first world leaders to congratulate Rudd on his victory, and the prime minister-elect told a press conference he had assured the president of “the centrality of the U.S. alliance in our approach to our future foreign policy.” He declined to say whether they had discussed Iraq during the call.

The White House in a statement said Howard, 68, had “served the people of Australia well by pursuing policies that led to strong economic growth and a commitment to keeping Australians safe by fighting extremists and their ideology around the world.”

Although Howard has held office since 1996, it was after 9/11 that the U.S.-Australian political and military alliance moved into a higher gear.

Howard happened to be in Washington the day al-Qaeda attacked, and he was quick to respond, invoking the mutual defense provisions of a half century-old military pact.

In its largest combat deployment since the Vietnam War, Canberra then contributed troops, including Special Forces, as well as aircraft and ships, to the mission to topple the al-Qaeda-allied Taliban in Afghanistan. A tough-on-security, tough-on-illegal-immigration platform saw Howard re-elected in late 2001 with an expanded majority.

A year later, Australia had its own direct experience with Islamist terrorism, when al-Qaeda-linked bombers targeted tourists on the Indonesian island of Bali, killing 202 people, 88 of them Australians.

Defying critics at home, Howard the following March became one of the most outspoken supporters of the war to overthrow Saddam Hussein and, after Britain, the biggest contributor to the U.S.-led military effort.

As Bush’s other Iraq partners — including leaders in Spain, Italy, Poland, Japan and, most recently, Britain — one by one left office, Howard remained a loyal ally, quick to support Washington even during the darkest periods of the drawn-out conflict.

Australia’s initial and continued role in the Iraq mission were issues in a 2004 election campaign, with Labor pledging to withdraw troops and Howard promising to keep them there until the job was done. Despite opinion polls favoring a Labor victory, Howard not only won, but his coalition again increased its House of Representatives majority and took control of the Senate.

Climate change outlaws

Howard’s opponents over the years have painted him as overly close to Bush, not just on Iraq and terrorism, but also on other issues ranging from unease over embryonic stem cell research to a more critical approach to the United Nations.

Perhaps nowhere were their common positions in the face of substantial pressure seen more clearly than with the politically charged issue of global warming.

Howard shared Bush’s skepticism about the Kyoto Protocol, which requires industrialized nations to cut their emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other gases blamed for climate change by set amounts by 2012.

Both refused to embrace the pact, citing risks to their countries’ economies and noting that Kyoto did not require China and India to curb emissions, despite being among the heaviest CO2 emitters.

Their shared stance prompted vilification from green activists, and former U.S. Vice-President Al Gore called the two countries the “Bonnie and Clyde” of global efforts to combat climate change.

In 2005, Australia and the U.S. launched a new Asia-Pacific climate partnership that aims to use technology in the search for cleaner fossil-fuel energy, while also promoting nuclear energy.

Significantly, the partnership brought in China and India, as well as Japan and South Korea. Together, the six members account for more than 50 percent of the world’s energy consumption and CO2 emissions.

With the defeat of Howard’s government, Canberra is now set to ratify Kyoto, even as the U.N. prepares to meet in Bali next month to hammer out a post-Kyoto agreement for the period after 2012.

During a visit to Australia last September, Gore predicted that if Australia joins Kyoto, it would be impossible for the U.S. to withstand the international pressure and continue to hold out alone.

All original CNSNews.com material, copyright 1998-2007 Cybercast News Service. Reprinted here with permission from CNSNews. Visit the website at CNSNews.com.