(by Jamie Dean, WorldMag.com) — On a Sunday morning at the First Montagnard Church of Raleigh, some 250 people from the Central Highlands of Vietnam read in unison a New Testament passage translated into Jarai, their native tongue: “By faith Abraham obeyed when he was called to go out to a place that he was to receive as an inheritance. And he went out, not knowing where he was going.”
It’s a passage that resonates with this group. Over the last 23 years, thousands of Montagnards-an ethnic minority from Vietnam’s Central Highlands-have fled their homeland, usually not knowing where they were going. Most have ended up in North Carolina with the help of refugee resettlement groups, struggling to adjust to a new way of life and worrying about those they left behind.
They’ve come here because life in the Central Highlands can be brutal, particularly for the mostly Protestant and Catholic Montagnards living under Communist rule. Adding to the severe mix: Montagnards allied with the United States and fought North Vietnam during the Vietnam War. Their Christian faith and their U.S. loyalty have left Montagnards a target for oppression and persecution in a land where they were already alienated from the Vietnamese.
But the Montagnards’ plight is just one part of religious persecution unfolding in Vietnam. The Communist government oppresses other Christian groups in some parts of the country, and also targets Buddhists and other religious groups. Authorities recently shut down the famous Bat Nha Buddhist monastery in the Central Highlands, smashing windows, damaging buildings, and ordering the 379 monks to leave. Another target: activists and attorneys who speak out for greater religious freedoms and human rights in the country.
All of this leads to an important moment for the U.S. State Department. The department’s Office of International Religious Freedom [USCIRF] is scheduled to release its annual International Religious Freedom Report this month-the first such report from the Obama administration. Officials will reveal whether they will add or remove any nations on the department’s list of Countries of Particular Concern (CPC) for religious freedom. A growing chorus of religious freedom advocates and members of Congress say Vietnam should be on that list. But the U.S. ambassador to Vietnam doesn’t seem so sure.
The department’s decision is weighty: Religious freedom experts say that putting Vietnam on the CPC list in the past led to small, but important improvements on the part of the Vietnamese government. Leaving them off the list, they say, could reverse improvements-or lead to worsening conditions for religious groups facing growing oppression.
The CPC designation indicates a country is guilty of particularly severe violations of religious freedom, and prods nations to make changes. Vietnam made the list in 2004 and 2005, but the Bush administration removed the nation from the CPC list in 2006, partially paving the way for Vietnam to join the World Trade Organization in 2007. Commissioners at the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) say that religious freedom conditions have deteriorated since then and that the State Department should put Vietnam back on the CPC list.
So far, the signals haven’t been favorable: U.S. ambassador to Vietnam Michael Michalak has said he doesn’t think there’s enough evidence to return Vietnam to the list. Groups like USCIRF-and some members of Congress-disagree and have documented cases of religious persecution over the last two years. But some of the most compelling evidence comes from those who have fled.
Hri Rmah fled the Central Highlands in 2004, three years after her husband escaped the country and came to North Carolina. Rmah says local authorities constantly harassed her Montagnard family over their Christian faith, particularly her husband: “In 2001, they took him to jail because of his religion.” Life for Rmah and her four children grew even more difficult until they were finally able to leave, she says. “It was very hard because the police came to my house all the time.”
Five years later, Rmah’s brow furrows when she talks about home. She’s just attended the church service in Raleigh, a luxury her parents in the Central Highlands don’t enjoy without harassment from local authorities. Rmah’s father was imprisoned for two years for his Christian practice. Prison guards forced him to carry heavy buckets of water on his head, leaving him significantly disabled. Now, they come to his home to ask about Rmah and her family. “They still monitor my parents’ religion all the time,” she says.
Rmah dismisses the Vietnamese government’s claim that it allows freedom of religion to Montagnards: “The Communists say one thing, but they do another.”
Y Phuat Enuol agrees. The 43-year-old Montagnard has been in the United States for a little over a year. Through a translator, Enuol describes the time he spent in prison for speaking out for greater religious freedoms in mass demonstrations by Protestants in 2001 and 2004. As he speaks in Jarai, he points to different parts of his body. The translator explains that Enuol is describing the beatings and torture he endured: a broken knee, two broken ribs, broken jaw, cracked chest, and needles driven into his fingers.
After authorities jailed him again in 2007, Enuol escaped to Cambodia and eventually came to the United States. Now he waits for his wife and seven children to join him, though he says Vietnamese officials are stalling the process for their paperwork to leave the country. In the meantime, he speaks with his wife only sporadically, convinced that local authorities have tapped the phones. What he does hear isn’t good: Local police harass his wife and berate her during mandatory community meetings.
Enuol says that government control extends to local churches and that Vietnamese reports of religious freedom are propaganda: “The truth is, the Montagnard religion in the Central Highlands is never free.”
After USCIRF officials visited Vietnam in May, commissioner Michael Cromartie testified before Congress that the group had documented detention of religious prisoners, severe restrictions on independent religious activity, and a government policy of intimidating new converts and suppressing the growth of religious groups.
Cromartie also testified about some improvements, including the release of some prisoners and more toleration for public worship in urban areas. The commissioner attributed those improvements to the State Department’s CPC designation of Vietnam from 2004 to 2006, but he said conditions had deteriorated since the United States removed the country from the list. Cromartie says the department should return Vietnam to the list this year. He disagrees with Michalak’s assessment that there isn’t enough evidence.
Some members of Congress agree. Rep. Ed Royce, R-Calif., introduced an amendment to a Foreign Relations bill that called on the State Department to return Vietnam to the CPC list. “Some have seen positive steps in Vietnam, but frankly, I don’t see it,” said Royce. “Religious freedom remains under attack.”
Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., is leading efforts to pass the Vietnam Human Rights Act, a resolution that details human-rights abuses and that would tie non-humanitarian foreign aid levels to progress in improving human-rights conditions. Back in July, 37 senators signed a letter demanding the release of Thadeus Nguyen Van Ly, a Catholic priest who’s been imprisoned a total of 17 years since 1970.
It’s not clear what impact the congressional pressure will have on the State Department, though as a senator last February, Barack Obama wrote a letter to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, asking the State Department to reevaluate its position on Vietnam in light of ongoing religious and human-rights abuses. USCIRF has called on President Obama to exert the same pressure now.
In the meantime, refugees continue to trickle into the United States from the Central Highlands of Vietnam. Aid organizations like Lutheran Family Services and World Relief help many Montagnards resettle. Rong Nay of the Raleigh-based Montagnard Human Rights Organization (MHRO) helps too. A Montagnard himself, Nay leads the group’s efforts to help with immigration and reunification for Montagnard families, as well as other refugee groups. The group also brings attention to human-rights issues in the Central Highlands.
Nay says if the State Department doesn’t put Vietnam back on the CPC list, “the situation in the Central Highlands will worsen.” He says he understands U.S. concerns over defense and trade agreements with Vietnam, but hopes that U.S. officials “will parallel those concerns with human rights.”
Kay Reibold, the group’s project development specialist, says keeping Vietnam off the list won’t help the country-or its citizens-in the long run: “You’re sending the wrong message if you keep reinforcing bad behavior.”
Copyright ©2009 WORLD Magazine. Reprinted here November 7th from the October 27, 2009 issue with permission from World Magazine. Visit the website at WorldMag.com.
1. What groups are persecuted by Vietnam’s Communist government?
2. What is the purpose of the State Department’s Office of International Religious Freedom?
3. a) What is the Countries of Particular Concern (CPC) list put out by the Office of International Religious Freedom?
b) How effective do religious freedom experts think the CPC designation was with the Vietnamese government?
4. Why does the U.S. ambassador to Vietnam think that this country should not be on the CPC list?
5. For what reasons do various groups and some members of Congress disagree with the ambassador? Be specific.
6. How do the two Montagnards interviewed for the article view religious freedom in Vietnam?
7. President Obama believes Vietnam should be on the CPC list – he wrote to then-Secretary of State Rice while still a Senator and asked her to put Vietnam back on the CPC list. Now as president, he must also consider U.S. trade and defense agreements with Vietnam. Do you think that the Vietnamese government can be swayed by the U.S. government and President Obama? Explain your answer.
The U.S. Office of International Religious Freedom has the mission of promoting religious freedom as a core objective of U.S. foreign policy. Headed by Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom, its Office Director and staff monitor religious persecution and discrimination worldwide, recommend and implement policies in respective regions or countries, and develop programs to promote religious freedom. (Read more at state.gov/g/drl/irf)
“Countries of particular concern,” or CPCs, are identified as such by the U.S. government for ongoing, egregious violations of religious freedom. CPC designation is the beginning of focused diplomatic activity required by the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (IRFA) from which important obligations in the form of consequent actions flow. Pursuant to the IRFA statute, the Commission issues recommended responses for the President, Secretary of State, and Congress to follow up on the CPC designations. (Read more at uscirf.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1456&Itemid=59)
The IRFA requires an annual review of the status of religious freedom worldwide and the designation of countries that have “engaged in or tolerated particularly severe violations of religious freedom” during the reporting period. The IRFA defines particularly severe violations of religious freedom as systematic, ongoing, egregious violations of religious freedom, including violations such as torture, degrading treatment or punishment, prolonged detention without charges, abduction or clandestine detention, or other flagrant denial of the right to life, liberty, or the security of persons. The President’s authority to designate CPCs has been delegated to the Secretary of State. In those cases where the Secretary of State designates a CPC, Congress is notified, and where non-economic policy options designed to bring about cessation of the particularly severe violations of religious freedom have reasonably been exhausted, an economic measure generally must be imposed. (from state.gov/g/drl/irf/c13003.htm)
The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) was created by the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 to monitor the status of freedom of thought, conscience, and religion or belief abroad, as defined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and related international instruments, and to give independent policy recommendations to the President, the Secretary of State, and the Congress. The Commission is a government entity created by Congress. It is funded entirely by the federal government on an annual basis and its staff members are government employees. The White House and Congressional leadership appoint the Commissioners. (Read more at uscirf.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=337&Itemid=44.)
Freedom House, a non-profit, nonpartisan organization, is a clear voice for democracy and freedom around the world. Through a vast array of international programs and publications, Freedom House is working to advance the remarkable worldwide expansion of political and economic freedom. (Read more at freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=2)
The Center for Religious Freedom (CRF) promotes religious freedom as a component of U.S. foreign policy by working with a worldwide network of religious freedom experts to provide defenses against religious persecution and oppression. Since its inception in 1986, the Center has sponsored investigative field missions, reported on the religious persecution of individuals and groups abroad, and undertaken advocacy on their behalf in the media, Congress, State Department and White House. After a ten-year affiliation with Freedom House, the Center for Religious Freedom joined Hudson Institute in January 2007. (Read more at crf.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=about_detail)
Read the Freedom House report on Vietnam at freedomhouse.org/inc/content/pubs/fiw/inc_country_detail.cfm?year=2009&country=7734&pf.
Read the U.S. State Department’s 2008 Human Rights Report on Vietnam at state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2008/eap/119063.htm.
Read about the Montagnards at the Montagnard Human Rights Organization website at mhro.org/history.html.