A Turkish fighter of the jihadist group Al-Nusra Front, bearing the flag of Al-Qaeda on his jacket, center, holds position with fellow comrades on April 4, 2013 in the Syrian village of Aziza, on the southern outskirts of Aleppo.  (Guillaume Briquet/AFP via Getty Images)

A Turkish fighter of the jihadist group Al-Nusra Front, bearing the flag of Al-Qaeda on his jacket, center, April 4, 2013 in the Syrian village of Aziza, on the southern outskirts of Aleppo. (Guillaume Briquet/AFP via Getty Images)

(by Kristina Wong, The Washington Times) – The Syrian opposition isn’t fighting just a brutal Iranian-backed regime accused of killing civilians with chemical weapons; it’s also battling within itself.

Moderate Syrian rebel groups are locked in combat with al Qaeda-linked extremists who have joined the opposition against Bashar Assad‘s regime and are fighting other rivals to win the hearts and minds of villagers as they try to gain support in the countryside.

“Those different groups with those competing agendas are starting to fight one another. They’re fighting for control over territory. They’re fighting for control over people. They’re fighting for control over wealth. They’re fighting to fight their way,” said Kenneth M. Pollack, a former CIA official who now serves as a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution’s Saban Center for Middle East Policy.

Moderate rebels began to realize the threat from al Qaeda-backed insurgents after one of those groups, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, killed a leader of the Free Syrian Army, the opposition umbrella group led by Syrian army defectors, according to several organizations in Washington that maintain contact between Syrian rebels and the U.S. government.

Syria’s moderate rebels refer to this realization of the danger posed by the Islamists as the “sahwa,” or awakening.

“It was a watershed moment. After that, moderate rebels [realized that] al Qaeda in Syria is a threat almost on par with the Syrian regime,” said Oubai Shahbandar, vice president for Middle East operations for the Syrian Support Group, which is charged with distributing U.S. aid to rebels.

Al Qaeda gains strength

Free Syrian Army soldiers in Aleppo take a break from the fighting. (Goran Tomasevic/Reuters)

Free Syrian Army soldiers in Aleppo take a break from the fighting. (Goran Tomasevic/Reuters)

The al Qaeda affiliates are gaining strength in the 2-year-old war against Mr. Assad. Thanks to funding and weapons from wealthy Persian Gulf states, the Islamists are the most organized, equipped and effective fighters of the opposition groups, which consist of a loose confederation of hundreds of militias.

Al Qaeda also is gaining support by providing villages with health care, blankets, fuel, wheat and other supplies captured from regime stores. They also have implemented courts under Shariah, or Islamic, law, which some villagers welcome as a sense of order amid the chaos of the civil war, which has cost an estimated 100,000 lives.

Moderate rebel groups under the Free Syrian Army are distributing aid and providing services through local government councils that have sprung up in places they control. However, those efforts lack sufficient funds and support to compete with al Qaeda, said Mouaz Moustafa, director of the Washington-based nonprofit Syrian Emergency Task Force, who travels frequently to Syria to support these councils.

He said the United States should realize that it has an opportunity to do more to help the moderate rebels in their campaign to spread their influence in the countryside.

“There’s huge room to empower the good guys and marginalize the bad guys all while fighting a very cunning regime,” said Mr. Moustafa, a former congressional aide to Blanche Lincoln, an Arkansas Democrat who served in the Senate. “The other two options are either warlords or religious [Islamic] extremists.”

Mr. Mouaz said more than 100 local civilian-run councils have sprung up at the town, village and provincial levels in areas controlled by the rebels. Their structures vary from place to place but are linked loosely with a partnership with local military units under the Free Syrian Army.

They consist of small teams of about 20 leaders who oversee education, finance, relief and aid distribution, infrastructure, human rights, public safety, media relations and judicial administration. They exist in Aleppo, the suburbs of Damascus, Idlib, northern Latakia, Hama and other areas controlled by moderate rebels.

The system would provide Syrians with an alternative to al Qaeda and could fill a void in government if the Syrian regime is toppled, Mr. Mouaz said. The United States has provided $117 million in communications and medical equipment to the opposition, as well as training to at least 1,500 leaders of these councils.

Doubts about ‘awakening’

Syria2However, he said, more needs to be done. For example, he said, the United States should channel all humanitarian aid through these councils to bolster their credibility against al Qaeda, as well as equip civilian police with uniforms and weapons, and support civil law and judicial systems.

“We must empower the emerging awakening against the transnational terrorist groups,” said Mr. Shahbandar, a former Defense Department official.

“Empowering moderate rebels is in America’s national security interests at a time when al Qaeda sees Syria as the front lines of an international terror campaign,” he said. “It’s still not too late.”

He likens the situation to the Sunni Awakening during the Iraq War in 2006, when moderate Sunnis began to reject al Qaeda extremists.

Although supporting these councils is a part of the U.S. policy in Syria, intelligence officials are skeptical about an “awakening” of moderate rebels. Pentagon officials doubt that any rebel groups would promote U.S. interests, even if Washington backed them.

Syria has about 1,000 armed rebel groups, 80 percent of which are under the Free Syrian Army umbrella, Mr. Mouaz said.

But with no end in sight to the civil war, supporting the local councils is the only prudent measure against al Qaeda extremists, advocates say.

“Right now, we still have a chance to support the right people in a situation that we simply can’t ignore,” said Mr. Mouaz, who recently met with high-ranking Pentagon officials.

Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC.  Reprinted from the Washington Times for educational purposes only. May not be reproduced on other websites without permission from washingtontimes.com.

Questions

Welcome back teachers and students!  Please note that the “Daily News Article” generally focuses on national news.  However, in an attempt to give you an overview of events in the Middle East, we are posting several articles this week on the ongoing crises in Egypt (see Monday and Thursday) and Syria (see Wednesday). (Also, check out “Background” and “Resources” below the questions each day.)

NOTE: Read “Background” and “Resources” below before answering the questions.

1. Who are the rebels in Syria? (Who make up the various opposition groups in Syria; i.e. those in opposition to President Assad)

Who is Mouaz Moustafa?  Should the U.S. government accept Mr. Moustafa representation of what is happening in Syria as accurate?  Explain your answer.

2. When did the moderate rebels first realize insurgents/extremists/Islamists/al-Qaeda had infiltrated their ranks?

3. How do the agendas of the moderates and the extremists in Syria differ?

4. Why are the Islamists such a strong group; why do Syrian villagers support Al-Qaeda?

5. Why aren’t moderates able to compete against al-Qaeda for the “hearts and minds” of many villagers?

6. What does Mouaz Moustafa of the Syrian Emergency Task Force think the U.S. should do to help the “good guys”?

7. From para. 17-19: Mr. Moustafa says: “Empowering moderate rebels is in America’s national security interests at a time when al Qaeda sees Syria as the front lines of an international terror campaign. It’s still not too late.” He likens the situation to the Sunni Awakening during the Iraq War in 2006, when moderate Sunnis began to reject al Qaeda extremists. Although supporting these councils is a part of the U.S. policy in Syria, intelligence officials are skeptical about an “awakening” of moderate rebels. Pentagon officials doubt that any rebel groups would promote U.S. interests, even if Washington backed them.
What do you think: is in in the best interests of the U.S. to attempt to support the moderates over the al-Qaeda and other extremists in their fight to oust Bashar Assad? Explain your answer.

NOTE:  “Answers” emails will resume September 3rd.  Sign-up now.

Background

The Free Syrian Army:

  • The Free Syrian Army (FSA) is an armed opposition structure operating in Syria since the start of the Syrian civil war. Composed of defected Syrian Armed Forces personnel and volunteers, its formation was announced on 29 July 2011 in a video released on the internet by a uniformed group of deserters from the Syrian military who called upon members of the Syrian army to defect and join them. 
  • The FSA’s leader in August 2011, Colonel Riad al-Asaad, announced that the FSA would work with demonstrators to bring down the regime, and declared that all security forces attacking civilians were justified targets. The FSA coordinated with the Syrian National Council starting in December 2011, and supported the National Coalition for Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces after the coalition’s November 2012 creation. 
  • A major reorganization of the FSA command structure occurred in December 2012, with al-Asaad retaining his formal role but losing effective power, and Brigadier General Salim Idris becoming Chief of Staff and effective leader.
  • On September 23, 2011, the Free Syrian Army merged with the Free Officers Movement and became the main opposition army group. 
  • By July of 2012, there were over 100,000 defectors from the armed forces reported, according to activist and media sources. About a year prior, American intelligence sources gave estimates of more than 10,000 defectors.  The actual number of soldiers defecting to the Free Syrian Army is unknown.
  • Although most of the FSA’s members are Sunni Arabs – Syria’s largest community – it includes battalions made up wholly or mostly of Kurds, Turkmen, Palestinians and Druze.
  • The Free Syrian Army is often seen as the more moderate and secular part of the opposition, in contrast with groups such as the al-Qaeda group Jabhat al-Nusra.  This has started a rift between the secular forces fighting the Syrian government and the Islamist groups; often resulting in deaths. (from wikipedia)

Resources

For a thorough analysis of the situation in Syria, read “Al-Qaeda Shows its True Colors in Syria” at: understandingwar.org/backgrounder/al-qaeda-shows-its-true-colors-syria

For background on Syria’s history and government, go to:

Get Free Answers

Daily “Answers” emails are provided for Daily News Articles, Tuesday’s World Events and Friday’s News Quiz.