image1062(by Alex Pappas, The Daily Caller) – Arguing federal workers should not get special treatment, Senator Rand Paul says he does not want taxpayers subsidizing the personal health-care plans of any federal employee – including Chief Justice John Roberts – anymore.

With some in Congress arguing lawmakers and their staff should not get subsidies to cover their health insurance as President Obama’s health-care law goes into effect, the junior Republican senator from Kentucky told The Daily Caller on Sunday that he’s going to start pushing a constitutional amendment that goes even further.

Paul’s proposal – outlawing any special exemptions for government employees – would mean all federal workers would have to purchase health insurance on the new Obamacare exchanges instead of getting taxpayer-funded subsidies. Some critics say those subsidies amount to special treatment. The Obamacare health insurance exchange opens Oct 1.

“My amendment says basically that everybody including Justice Roberts – who seems to be such a fan of Obamacare – gets it too,” Paul told TheDC by phone on Sunday from Mackinac Island in Michigan, where he won a straw poll of potential Republican candidates for president in 2016.

“See, right now, Justice Roberts is still continuing to have federal employee health insurance subsidized by the taxpayer,” Paul said. “And if he likes Obamacare so much, I’m going to give him an amendment that gives Obamacare to Justice Roberts.”

Chief Justice Roberts famously voted to uphold the constitutionality of Obama’s unpopular health-care law when it went before the Supreme Court last year.

Paul’s constitutional amendment says no federal employees should get special exemptions from laws. The senator also plans to push a proposal requiring that Congress and all federal employees rely on Obamacare for their insurance.

His proposal comes after outrage from conservatives about a so-called “exemption” for members of Congress and their staff from Obamacare.

What’s being referred to as the “Obamacare fix” for lawmakers and staff was made because the Affordable Care Act [Obamacare] includes an amendment from a Republican senator that changes how the government currently covers most of the cost of health-care premiums for members of Congress and their staffers. The new law mandates that members and staff must enter into exchanges or be covered by insurance “created” by law.

But after [Senators and Representatives expressed] concerns about the cost of health care going up for congressional employees, the Office of Personnel Management* announced in August that it would provide a subsidy of about 75 percent of the cost for the health care of members and staff. [*The Office of Personnel Management is an independent agency of the U.S. government that manages all civilian federal employees.]

Paul revealed his new amendment push on Sunday after The Daily Caller inquired about a proposal from Louisiana Sen. David Vitter, who has proposed killing those federal Obamacare subsidies for lawmakers and their staff. “I support any effort to make all laws applicable to Congress that we pass,” Paul said.

But Paul says his proposal goes even further.

“I think mine is a little more inclusive,” Paul explained. “Mine, compared to Vitter’s,  would include all federal employees, and save billions of dollars.”

He added: “Why don’t we do it for all federal employees? And mine would save quite a bit more money.”

Lawmakers, including Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, have defended the special Obamacare exemptions being made for lawmakers and their staff. Earlier this month, the Nevada Democrat flatly stated, “That’s what the law says, and we’ll be part of that.”

“We’ll be treated like the rest of the federal employees,” Reid said. “It’s nothing unique that employers help pay for health care.”

 Reprinted here for educational purposes only. May not be reproduced on other websites without permission from Daily Caller. Visit the website at dailycaller.com.

Questions

1.  a) Who is Rand Paul?
b)  What is Sen. Paul proposing be done with the government subsidized health insurance federal employees currently receive? Be specific.
c)  Why is Sen. Paul making this proposal?

2.  Are conservatives the only Americans annoyed that Congress passed Obamacare into law, but they, their families and staff are exempt from the law?  Ask a few relatives (parents, grandparents, aunts/uncles), friends, teachers, etc.

3.  What does the “Obamacare fix” do for Congress members’ and their staffers?

4.  When members of Congress complained in August that the cost of their (and their staffers) health insurance would increase under Obamacare, what did the Office of Personnel Management do?

5.  Define: subsidy, subsidize, exempt and exemption.

6.  a) Should any/all federal government employees’ health insurance payments be subsidized by the government?  Explain your answer.
b)  Should any federal employees (postal workers, Congressmen, employees in government offices in D.C., Supreme Court Justices, etc.) be exempt from Obamacare? Explain your answer.
c)  Ask a parent the same questions.

Background

The Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program is a system of “managed competition” through which employee health benefits are provided to civilian government employees. The government pays 72% of the weighted average premium of all plans, not to exceed 75% of the premium for any one plan (calculated separately for individual and family coverage). The FEHB program is administered by the United States Office of Personnel Management.

Get Free Answers

Daily “Answers” emails are provided for Daily News Articles, Tuesday’s World Events and Friday’s News Quiz.