Wednesday's Biased Item - September 19, 2007
EXCERPT
(from the NewsBusters.org post):
...ABC anchor Dan
Harris,... at the top of Sunday's World News ... highlighted how “one
of the most respected figures in Washington says the Bush administration went to
war in Iraq because of oil.†Harris soon referred to it as “an eyebrow
raising allegation on Iraq†in a new book from Alan Greenspan, the former
Chairman of the Federal Reserve. But after a Monday Washington Post story, in which Greenspan declared that oil
was “not the administration's motive,†and an appearance by Mr.
Greenspan on the Today show made abundantly clear the inaccuracy of
the implication that Greenspan was somehow endorsing a...theory about how George
W. Bush went to war to financially benefit Dick Cheney's oil industry friends.
ABC's World News on Monday failed to offer any correction for its incendiary,
and erroneous, reporting. In fact, the September 17 World News didn't mention
Greenspan at all.
Go to NewsBusters.org for the original posting.
ANSWERS:
1. Opinion
question. Answers vary.
2. Alan Greenspan is a well-known
and highly respected individual. Even if ABC News made an honest mistake
in their report, to not issue a correction to a majorly inaccurate
report is irresponsible journalism. What can the viewer assume but
that ABC News cares more about saying that President Bush went to war for oil,
than the fact that Mr. Greenspan did not mean to imply such a thing in his
book. Many people who only watch ABC's World News will be left with
the false impression that Mr. Greenspan thinks the Bush Administration
went to Iraq for oil.